NWHM Celebrates Women’s Equality Day

August 24th, 2011

Gov. Sproul of Pennsylvania Signing Suffrage Amendment

August 26th is Women’s Equality Day and marks the anniversary of national woman suffrage.  Across the seventy-two years between the first major women’s rights conference at Senecca Falls, New York, in 1848, and the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment, thousands of people participated in marches through cities like New York and Washington DC, wrote editorials and pamphlets, gave speeches all over the nation, lobbied political organizations, and held demonstrations with the goal of achieving voting rights for women.  Women also picketed the White House with questions like, “Mr. President, what are you going to do about woman’s suffrage?” “Mr. President, how long must women wait for liberty?”  This was the first time in history that a group of people picketed the White House.

The woman suffrage amendment was introduced for the first time to the United States Congress on January 10, 1878.  It was re-submitted numerous times until finally in June 1919 the amendment received approval from both the House of Representatives and the Senate.  Over the following year the suffragists spent their time lobbying states in order to have the amendment ratified by the required two-thirds of the states.  On August 24th, Tennessee, the final state needed for ratification, narrowly signed the approval by one vote.  The vote belonged to Harry Burn, who heeded the words of his mother when she urged him to vote yes on suffrage.  The U.S. Secretary of State Bainbridge Colby signed the amendment into law on August 26, 1920.

Fifty years later on August 26th, 1970, Betty Friedan and the National Organization of Women (NOW) organized a nationwide Women’s Strike for Equality.  Women across the political spectrum joined together to demand equal opportunities in employment, education, and twenty-four hour child-care centers.  This was the largest protest for gender equality in U.S. history.  There were demonstrations and rallies in more than ninety major cities and small towns across the country and over 100,000 women participated, including 50,000 who marched down Fifth Avenue in New York City.

Several other acts occurred on that day to help the cause and prompt more press coverage on the women’s movement.  For example, women in New York City took over the Statue of Liberty.  In preparation, several women climbed up to measure the wind velocity.  Later they returned to the Statue with two forty-foot banners to hang from the crown.  One read: “March on August 26 for Equality.” The other: “Women of the World Unite.”  An organized group stopped the ticker tape at the American Stock Exchange, and they held signs with slogans like, “We won’t bear any more bull.”  Another action taken during the day was a lawsuit filed against the New York City Board of Education to gain equality for women in educational administration. The case lasted about ten years and finally resulted in a larger increase in female principals.

While the strike did not halt the activities of the nation, it drew national attention to the women’s rights movement.  For example, The New York Times published their first major article on the feminist movement by covering the events of the day.  It even included a map of the route the marchers took through New York City.

The following year in 1971, Representative Bella Abzug (D-NY) introduced a bill designating August 26th of each year as Women’s Equality Day and the bill passed.  Part of the bill reads that Women’s Equality Day is a symbol of women’s continued fight for equal rights and that the United States commends and supports them.  It decreed that the President is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation annually in commemoration of woman suffrage and the 1970 Strike for Equality. Women today continue to draw on the history of these brave and determined women.

Response to Huffington Post

August 9th, 2011

We applaud the well-written article on the National Women’s History Museum (NWHM) by Andrea Stone of the Huffington Post. We are proud to celebrate the accomplishments of women. As indicated in Ms. Stone’s article, the NWHM Board has a policy that all program content will be determined by scholars, just like at the Smithsonian and other world-class institutions. While all information on the NWHM website has been reviewed by historians before being posted, this year we invited scholars to review the content on our site in planning the museum’s programs. Our goal is to always ensure that accurate information is available on women’s history. We are currently working on a number of notable-women biographies and hope to include them on our site in the near future. We are always eager to hear about other women in history who should be honored. Please check our site at www.nwhm.org and let us know your thoughts.

Your financial support for our efforts will help ensure that women’s history is an integrated part of our nation’s story.

Joan Wages, President & CEO, National Women’s History Museum

A Tribute to First Lady Betty Ford

July 12th, 2011

 A Tribute to First Lady Betty Ford  

 By: Joan Wages, NWHM President & CEO  

Betty Ford, 1974

First Lady Betty Ford was both a controversial pioneer, a crusader for women’s rights, and one of the most respected and beloved women in America. 

Like the suffragists, she empowered generations and changed the lives of thousands. It is women like her who have shaped our nation. 

Soon after her husband was inaugurated, the first lady held her first press conference, immediately addressing the Equal Rights Amendment. In 1975, Ford spoke at the International Women’s Year meeting where she made what was called “the most progressive [speech] made by any president’s wife since Eleanor Roosevelt,” she encouraged all women to work for passage of the ERA. To quote Mrs. Ford, “the search for human freedom can never be complete without freedom for women.” 

Before Ford’s admission, the subject of breast cancer and substance abuse was taboo. She freed women from their emotional solitary confinement.  Ford’s brave disclosure gave men and women suffering from addiction a sense they were not alone. 

 In 1982, she went on to found the Betty Ford Center for substance abuse and addiction in Rancho Mirage, California. She tirelessly campaigned to raise funds for, and awareness of, drug addiction and  treatment.    

President Gerald Ford and First Lady Betty Ford celebrate winning the nomination at the Republican National Convention, Kansas City, Missouri, 1976

In 1991, Ford was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by President George H.W. Bush for her contribution to health issues, with a citation reading, “her courage and candor have inspired millions of Americans to restore their health, protect their dignity, and shape full lives for themselves.” Ford’s ability to influence and advocate so effectively – and to overcome the controversy generated by some of her candor –stemmed from the nation’s introduction to her as an appealing and relatable first lady. While she infused the role of first lady with passionate advocacy, she also embraced her traditional duties with the same enthusiastic energy.  We ALL owe a great debt of gratitude to Betty Ford –we will never forget her! Click here to read the Washington Post’s tribute to Betty Ford. 

Click here to read the Washington Post’s tribute to Betty Ford.

An Exceprt from Scholar & Author Sally McMillen’s Letter to NWHM President, Joan Wages

May 27th, 2011

“What a treat it was to be there among such a stimulating group of women to discuss ideas for the future National Women’s History Museum.You remind me of the nineteenth-century suffragists I have written about who pursued a dream and never gave up, though I certainly hope this dream will not take 72 years to accomplish as it did theirs.

I also was interested to hear more details about the famous suffrage statue that is back in the rotunda. I knew about it, and am probably going to use it as the opening of my biography on Lucy Stone. It is a tragedy that she was not included in the statue since she was every bit as involved in the fight for woman suffrage as those three. I tried to do her justice in my book and also decided what she needs is what I hope will be a good biography well grounded in history. Her absence from the statue is a reminder to how history gets written, who writes it, and how divisiveness and personal issues can interfere with an accurate view of history. I feel honored to be included in this project.”

      -Sally McMillen, scholar/author, Lucy Stone biography Letter to Joan Wages, President, National Women’s History Museum May 20, 2011

Women’s History Museum is Inspiring

May 25th, 2011

“Women’s History Museum could be Inspiring” 

 The Marietta Times- May 20, 2011
http://www.mariettatimes.com/page/content.detail/id/536135/Women-s-History-Museum–could-be-inspiring.html

We support efforts to develop a national Women’s History Museum and join others in asking Congress to move forward with the idea.

 This week, State Rep. Debbie Phillips outlined details of the plan in a letter she submitted to this newspaper. In her letter, Phillips said the goal of the Women’s History Museum is to make the contribution of women in our country more visible, more mainstream. She points out contributions of women can be found everywhere, yet women’s accomplishments are not prevalent in our nation’s history books or national monuments and parks.

The current proposal calls for a women’s museum adjacent to the National Mall in Washington, D.C. Phillips also reports no federal money would be sought in the building of this museum. While there is a National Women’s Hall of Fame located in New York, a museum in our nation’s capital is ideal.

Too often, the contributions of minorities in general have been often overlooked in our nation’s history, and women are no exception. We think it’s appropriate to recognize women’s achievements in this way in the hopes that it will then make women’s role in history more prominent and well known by all. It’s our hope that the achievements of the past will inspire the women of the future.

© Copyright 2011 The Marietta Times. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Letter to the Editor: Support the Women’s History Museum Act

May 25th, 2011

Support the Women’s History Museum Act

May 19, 2011
The Marietta Times
Save | Bookmark and Share

May is the month for Mother’s Day, an appropriate time to continue to recognize and commemorate our mothers and grandmothers. It is also the appropriate month to honor our nation’s foremothers by urging Congress to pass the National Women’s History Museum Act.

The women who helped to build this country – who tended to the families while men were away at war, who built businesses to sustain themselves and their families, and who were innovators in their field – have been left out of our national story. Only 1 in 10 figures in today’s history textbooks is a woman, few statues are in our national parks and less than a dozen of the 214 statues in our nation’s Capitol Building portray woman leaders. Yet, women have impacted every aspect of our lives whether it is education, art, medicine, journalism, politics, or technology.

The National Women’s History Museum (NWHM) will change this by bringing women’s history into the mainstream. Legislation is pending in Congress (H.R. 1269 and S. 680) that would provide NWHM a home adjacent to the National Mall in Washington, D.C. And to top it off, not one dime of federal money is being requested!

I join my colleagues from across the nation through the National Foundation for Women Legislators (NFWL), in urging Speaker John Boehner to honor the women of this country by bringing H.R. 1269 to the floor for a vote, as soon as possible.

Debbie Phillips, state representative

Ohio House District 92

South Carolina General Assembly Resolution to Support NWHM Adopted May 5

May 5th, 2011

South Carolina General Assembly

119th Session, 2011-2012

H. 4183

House Resolution

Sponsors: Reps. Brady, Parks, Thayer, Dillard, Butler Garrick, Erickson, Long, Allison, Neilson, Cobb‑Hunter, Henderson, Horne, Munnerlyn and Nanney

Introduced in the House on May 5, 2011

Adopted by the House on May 5, 2011

A HOUSE RESOLUTION

TO SUPPORT THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A NATIONAL WOMEN’S HISTORY MUSEUM IN WASHINGTON, D. C., IN ORDER TO SECURE A PERMANENT HOME IN THE NATION’S CAPITAL THAT WILL HIGHLIGHT THE IMPORTANT ROLE WOMEN HAVE PLAYED IN SHAPING THIS GREAT NATION.

Whereas, in 1987, Congress declared March to serve as “Women’s History Month” to acknowledge the important role women have played in shaping the United States of America; and

Whereas, although women constitute a majority of the nation’s population, their achievements and contributions are underrepresented in museums and memorials; and

Whereas, only ten percent of the people identified in a recent survey of eighteen history textbooks were women; and

Whereas, in 1999, The President’s Commission on the Celebration of Women in American History called for a women’s history museum to be established on “The National Mall” in Washington, D. C.; and

Whereas, the National Women’s History Museum (NWHM), founded in 1996, is a non‑partisan, non‑profit, educational institution dedicated to preserving, interpreting, and celebrating the diverse historic contributions of women, and integrating the heritage of women fully into the nation’s history; and

Whereas, the NWHM seeks a site on or close to the National Mall and in close proximity to the White House and the United States Capitol Building; and

Whereas, the NWHM has identified a vacant lot that is a federally owned property for sale near the National Mall, located at 12th Street and Independence Avenue S. W.; and

Whereas, legislation is currently pending in Congress seeking authorization for the NWHM to be able to purchase this property at fair market value with privately raised funds, and no federal funds are being requested for the purchase of this land; and

Whereas, there are museums dedicated to flight, postage stamps, buildings, and many other important people and issues of interest but not to women, yet women comprise fifty‑three percent of the nation’s population; and

Whereas, the NWHM will showcase the full history of women in the United States and the contributions they have made and continue to make in the marketplace, arts and sciences, government, entertainment, education, home, and community; and

Whereas, representing eight million women, a coalition of forty women’s organizations which includes the National Foundation for Women Legislators supports the efforts of the NWHM to establish a permanent residence near the National Mall, the most prominent location for museums to be situated in the nation’s capital.  Now, therefore,

Be it resolved by the House of Representatives:

That the members of the South Carolina House of Representatives, by this resolution, support the establishment of a National Women’s History Museum in Washington, D. C., in order to secure a permanent home in the nation’s capital that will highlight the important role women have played in shaping this great nation.

Be it further resolved that a copy of this resolution be forwarded to the members of the South Carolina Congressional Delegation.

‑‑‑‑XX‑‑‑‑

Latino museum recommended for Mall (The Examiner, 5/5/2011)

May 5th, 2011

Latino museum recommended for Mall (The Examiner, 5/5/2011)

By: Liz Farmer 05/05/11 8:05 PM

A federal commission is asking Congress to establish a new museum next to the Capitol dedicated to Latino American history and culture.

The report, released Thursday and endorsed by Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, calls for Congress to create a museum that would commemorate the fastest-growing population in the country and serve as “a gateway to the National Mall.” It calls for a 50-50 split between private fundraising and federal dollars to raise $600 million over 10 years to plan and build the museum. It also stipulates that no federal funding would be needed for the first six years.

“The commission … recognizes that it must balance two vital priorities: not contributing to any new federal expenditure in the short term, while clearly moving forward with a national museum that integrates the Latino experience into the American narrative,” the report said.

The report was issued by the National Museum of the American Latino Commission, which was established in 2008 by Congress and has 23 members, including actress Eva Longoria.

But getting a new Smithsonian Institution museum is no easy task, and it will likely be more than a decade before ground breaks on a Latino heritage museum. The National Museum of the American Indian was created in 1989 and opened in 2004; the National Museum of African American History and Culture was founded in 2003 and is expected to open in 2015, according to Linda St. Thomas, a Smithsonian spokeswoman.

First, Congress passes legislation founding the museum, then it passes a separate appropriations bill to fund it.

That process “can take years,” and “with the budget situation now, I don’t think one should assume you get all money you ask for each year,” St. Thomas said.

And even though the Latino Museum proposes self-funding for its first six years, the economic climate for nonprofits remains uncertain. The privately funded National Women’s History Museum has been entrenched in its own effort to build a museum on the National Mall since 1996.

The women’s history group is now pushing legislation through Congress that was tabled last session to buy land on the Mall near 12th Street and Independence Avenue.

“One of the reasons we looked at going private was because we thought we could make it happen quicker,” said Joan Wages, the museum president. “It’s a long road either way.”

http://washingtonexaminer.com/local/dc/2011/05/latino-museum-recommended-mall

Press: The Republic (4/22/11)

April 22nd, 2011

Washcall: Internet taxation – Women’s History Museum

By LISA HOFFMAN

WASHINGTON – The gaping chasms that are state budget deficits may become the black hole of Internet taxation this year, drawing Congress and some states inexorably into instituting taxes on what you purchase online.

That’s what some analysts expect, viewing the nation’s dismal fiscal balance sheets, which are a powerful lure for a piece of the $188 billion in online retail sales forecast for 2011.

Though taxes may be a toxic topic for lawmakers, especially with the 2012 elections looming, supporters of online taxes portray the issue as one of fairness: Why should out-of-state companies such as Amazon.com and Overstock.com enjoy the unfair advantage of selling products cheaper than the bricks-and-mortar store down the block, which often has to collect local and state taxes on each purchase?

That’s the rationale for the Main Street Fairness Act, a measure that Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., one of the most liberal members of the chamber, is expected to introduce shortly. Sen. Mike Enzi, a fierce Republican from Wyoming, is likely to co-sponsor it.

Look for Walmart, Target and other merchants with actual stores to lobby hard for Durbin’s measure, while eBay, Yahoo and iTunes to mobilize to kill it.

Supporters of a National Women’s History Museum are trying again to get permission from Congress to buy a federally owned plot of land on the edge of the National Mall.

No taxpayer money will be used to create the estimated $50 million museum, which was first brought to Capitol Hill last year, supporters say. What they do need is Congress’ permission to buy a plot of unused land close to the Mall.

A cast of entertainment heavyweights is backing the endeavor, including country singers Trisha Yearwood, Garth Brooks and Lee Ann Womack. The museum’s official spokesperson is actor Meryl Streep, who has personally pledged $1 million to the cause.

Last year, the House and Senate approved the purchase. But later, two GOP senators — Jim DeMint of South Carolina and Tom Coburn of Oklahoma — put a hold on the measure, saying such a museum was unneeded.

There are already 100 museums that chronicle women’s history, Coburn has said, including the National Cowgirl Museum and Hall of Fame in Texas and the Quilters Hall of Fame in Indiana.

Two museum-bill sponsors, Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., and Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, reintroduced the measure this month.

A much-anticipated Pentagon report on whether the rule barring women from direct combat units should be modified or overturned has missed its deadline.

Scheduled to be delivered to Congress on April 15, the report is now slated to hit Capitol Hill on Oct. 1. At least part of the reason for the delay is to shield the report from becoming a political hand grenade during the battle over the 2012 defense budget, which is expected to be fierce.

Virtually all soundings from the Pentagon brass — with the exception of some in the Marine Corps — is that the doors of war will be opened further for women in uniform, who have been in the thick of combat in Iraq and Afghanistan.

At last count, more than 259,000 women troops have served in those conflicts. The casualty count: 137 killed and 1,758 wounded.

http://www.therepublic.com/view/story/washcall042211/washcall042211/

Printed in The Republic – 4/22/2011

New Jersey NWHM Regional Council Gala

April 21st, 2011
As a grand finale event for Women’s History Month, the National Women’s History Museum (NWHM) hosted a spectacular gala event at the Hyatt Hotel in New Brunswick on Thursday, March 31. The gala, organized by the New Jersey Regional Council of NWHM, recognized the importance of the work and mission of the Museum.

The Gala raised over $23,000 to support the programs and initiatives of the National Women’s History Museum.

NWHM President Joan B. Wages (L), Tanya Young Williams (middle), Janice Kovach (R)

The Museum is embarking on a campaign to build a world-class Museum near the National Mall in Washington, DC. Legislation is pending in Congress that will allow the Museum to purchase a site at 12th and Independence Ave, SW. The Museum is funding the purchase of the land, and the building and operation of the Museum completely through private contributions from donors and supporters. NWHM will receive no money from the federal government.

“New Jersey has been home to trail blazers, from suffragist Alice Paul to Red Cross founder Clara Barton and Academy Award winning actress and NWHM spokesperson, Meryl Streep,” said Museum President Joan Wages in her remarks. “The women of New Jersey have a strength and resilience that defines this great country.”

The New Jersey Regional Council is comprised of people of great accomplishment from throughout the state. Additionally, Governor Chris Christie and Mrs. Mary Pat Christie, Governor Brendan Byrne and Mrs. Ruthi Byrne, Governor Thomas Kean and Mrs. Deborah Kean, Governor Christie Todd Whitman and Mr. John Whitman, Governor Donald DiFrancesco and Mrs. Diane DiFrancesco, Governor James E. McGreevey and Mr. Mark O’Donnell, Governor Richard Codey and Mrs. Mary Jo Codey, Governor Jon Corzine and Mrs. Sharon Levine Corzine, and members of the state legislature joined the efforts to raise awareness of the importance of the Museum.

Senate Majority Leader and New Jersey Regional Council Member Senator Barbara Buono said, “While our politics in Trenton and Washington, D.C. are fractious at the moment, it is a testament to our shared belief in the educational goals of the museum that my colleagues and I have come together to support this wonderful effort.”

The Museum would like to thank the New Jersey Regional Council Members: Senator Barbara Buono, Councilwoman Mildred Crump, Karen Kominsky, Jeannine LaRue, and Jason Casesse. A special thanks to our NJ Co-Chair, Joan Verplank, and Chairwoman, Janice Kovach for their commitment to the Museum and the many hours of hard work that went into making the gala a smashing success.

If you are interested in joining the Museum, joining a Regional Council in your area, or forming a Regional Council, please contact Sally Anderson at sanderson@nwhm.org, or 703-461-1920.

Photos credited to Hal Brown Photography